A slight risk sure. But a much smaller risk than just anyone, unvetted by a regulated company with a brand image to uphold, putting whatever they want onchain. Mechanic has a very good point there. And once again you are ignoring all arguments. You take 0 responsibility in your position at Core.

This is beside the fact that Knots is not an anti-spam implementation. It's a highly configurable implementation, and you lie about that too to hide the fact that you are being intellectually dishonest to take away configuration options and to arbitrate the majority of mempool policies to the way you see fit, as if you think for everyone else. It is fraud of a sort, once you silence discussion and misrepresent the facts like you have been.