Motivated by an intriguing discussion about quantum computing on nostr:nprofile1qqsg2zqd8wkhpnxu6lm5c2dyfa2mhpwte57apjae2ldp6g2mmwf3ypqpz9mhxue69uhkummnw3ezuamfdejj7qgcwaehxw309ahx7um5wghxvmt59emkj73wvf5h5tcpr9mhxue69uhhyetvv9ujuumwdae8gtnnda3kjctv9urj9dyf podcast:
what's everyone's thoughts on what to do with the bitcoin (~25% of supply) tied to quantum-vulnerable P2PK addresses? #asknostr
https://fountain.fm/episode/F6kGwLRzgpG39pm0OdKm
Login to reply
Replies (2)
Why are you so sure that a fractional-reserve model of physics poses any threat to Bitcoin’s cryptography?
Isn’t it ironic that Bitcoiners reject fractional-reserve money as unsound, yet simultaneously fear that a fractional-reserve ontology of physics (where unmeasured possibilities are treated as real states) can somehow overpower the most sound, finite, verified system ever created?
If fractional-reserve accounting can’t produce sound money, why would fractional-reserve physics produce sound computation?
That's intriguing, I'm pretty un-educated on the depths of quantum. Do you have any links so I can learn what you're talking about with fractional-reserve models of physics?