Thread

Zero-JS Hypermedia Browser

Relays: 5
Replies: 2
Generated: 18:58:49
Motivated by an intriguing discussion about quantum computing on nostr:nprofile1qqsg2zqd8wkhpnxu6lm5c2dyfa2mhpwte57apjae2ldp6g2mmwf3ypqpz9mhxue69uhkummnw3ezuamfdejj7qgcwaehxw309ahx7um5wghxvmt59emkj73wvf5h5tcpr9mhxue69uhhyetvv9ujuumwdae8gtnnda3kjctv9urj9dyf podcast: what's everyone's thoughts on what to do with the bitcoin (~25% of supply) tied to quantum-vulnerable P2PK addresses? #asknostr https://fountain.fm/episode/F6kGwLRzgpG39pm0OdKm
2025-11-26 19:44:45 from 1 relay(s) 1 replies ↓
Login to reply

Replies (2)

Why are you so sure that a fractional-reserve model of physics poses any threat to Bitcoin’s cryptography? Isn’t it ironic that Bitcoiners reject fractional-reserve money as unsound, yet simultaneously fear that a fractional-reserve ontology of physics (where unmeasured possibilities are treated as real states) can somehow overpower the most sound, finite, verified system ever created? If fractional-reserve accounting can’t produce sound money, why would fractional-reserve physics produce sound computation?
2025-11-27 17:36:40 from 1 relay(s) ↑ Parent 1 replies ↓ Reply