If in theory it was tampered with you'd just have to revoke it in your signer. I don't think anyone exploited it in the wild.
Login to reply
Replies (1)
That's the concern for users that enabled auto-allow for amber specifically, the xss would have the ability sign arbitrary requests on behalf of the user. For nip46 aka bunker users, it would be a Harvest Now, Decrypt Later attack with exfiltrated session keys.