That seems much more rational than a TDS take on the situation. And I admit to not viewing evidence in this specific case.
While most TDS stricken liberals snap to “Trump did a thing, here’s why it’s wrong “, after his first term I’m much more inclined to let him cook.
If the supreme court eventually says it was illegal then I’ll be inclined to agree with you.
Login to reply
Replies (1)
And also, if it’s not adjudicated as illegal, then your opinion of the legal interpretation doesn’t really matter.