TY but I know exactly how it works, as you can see changes are aprroved/merged by the maintainers like I said, who have permissions to do so. The fact that you think there are no leaders just because there is a flow chart on how to submit PRs and think they don't have contact with anyone is naive, since there are owners of the repo/project, they also decide who gets what permissions on the repo. People need to get this in their head Core is not a democracy or decentralized. If Core maintainers decide to go against a community decision they can, they can and SHOULD be opinionated on what kind of implementation they want. It would make things clearer for everyone and push others to make their own node implementations, and that is what helps decentralization over node implementations. But back to to your OP check the link i shared.
Login to reply
Replies (3)
There are no leaders, those maintainers didn't get magically anointed they proved their worth and were selected by the entire Core team like pretty much every other FOSS project, you clearly have no idea how Core's development process even works. Like I said, go back to basics before buying into psyops.
Ah yes ok, you're right, any project on GH with a handful of people that have merge access is decentralized.
I don't remember agreeing to increased OP return size, but it's a decentralized team of devs aka I'm not part of it so my vote doesn't matter 🤡.