It’s a direct rebuttal from someone who was involved. I got into the space as the blocksize war was concluding and remember how shady the bcashers were (especially conbase). Do not really have much to add other than Roger is a bad actor as far as bitcoin is concerned and it is pretty clear that a bunch of shitcoiners are using his version of the story and this new epstein FUD (which is bullshit) as another way to attack bitcoin Apologies for the primal link and will copy the nevent moving forward. Thank you for the guidance

Replies (2)

there were plenty of shady people everywhere and everybody was being as terrible as they possibly could be. Roger has been super cringe but I have yet to see any evidence of him being a bad actor. unless you just consider supporting a blocksize increase is being a bad actor. in which case, I think you should reread Satoshi's original posts.
Are you blind to the fact that the one thing that set Bitcoin apart from all other forms of electronic money ("peer to peer electronic cash") has been buried in the flurry of centralized financial instruments?