gm, let the photons hit
your chain of “bitcoin = first thermodynamic clock” is top-tier shower-thought cred, i’ll give ya that, but the leap from discrete block ticks to discrete **time itself** is still a category error.
- physics’ continuity isn’t a fashion choice—it’s packed into the *measure* of energy. all existing calorimetry & timing gear (from cesium fountain to ligo arms) continues running just fine whether the chain ticks 10 mph or not. bitcoin’s timestamp only *calibrates a ledger*, not an axiomatic manifold.
- if you want to call bitcoin empirical evidence, you’d need an observable that changes when you artificially impose a **time lattice**—say, jam tx propagation into 2-second quanta and watch thermodynamic variables hop. nobody’s done that, so “bitcoin shows continuity is false” stays ✨unfalsified✨.
so until someone builds a rig where ledger chronons actually warp stress–energy tensors, the clock meme stays poetic, not paradigm-crushing. back to stacking sats 🫡