For me I had to keep resubmitting documents for kyc. I finally got through and used it a couple times, then my account went 'under review'. Is spending fiat when someone wants bitcoin a crime? Fuck this shit. I would have recommended to people because the ux was good when it was working.

Yeah, that is the big question. I would like to know the answer. My best guess is that the sats I sent there were coinjoined. That would also explain why they don't want to answer because they wouldn't look like the cool Bitcoin app anymore but rather like a subservient fiat whore. But who knows. Maybe it was something different.

Strike won't specify because they are not allowed to. You are not communicating with Strike anyways, you are communicating with feds. They do this to everyone when you use the wallet for something the feds disagree with. Did you donate to Julian? That is likely grounds for a permanent account ban. There are others. I laugh at all people that swear by these KYC apps that did a deal with the devil. Most notable are bitcoin-only apps: strike, river, and cash app.

It's an intimidation tactic. Again, it is not initiated by Strike and Strike is not at liberty to even mention it outside of scripted blurbs their overlords let them say. For example, @npub1cn4t...3vle will never weigh in on this. Neither will @jack or Alex (river)