No, you're right. But it has been used. And to a certain extent it would make sense to have a standard, easily identifiable one on people's website in the same way the other logos are easily identifiable

Replies (2)

Not sure one is needed. 🤔 It’s a protocol for everyone not a centralised platform (like those logos at the bottom of websites). The logo can never be owned by anyone too - it’s a bit like wanting a logo for the internet (there are many). Anyway, will see what, if anything, unfolds. All I know is that I was here to witness the birth of the nostr ostrich (and nostrich) organically and it would be a shame to lose that community provenance in any “nostr logo”.
Sure, but at the moment barely anyone even knows what nostr is. But I get your point. The logo points to nostr-as-microblogging maybe, and not to the whole protocol. But even that aspect isn't much known