This equation explains how stars work, how nuclear bombs work, how energy and matter are related and is therefore critical in our understanding of how the universe we observe around us formed. If you wanted to make that point you needed to choose a more obscure equation that is not so fundamental to our understanding of reality. All you’ve done here is show how little you understand.

Curvature that you can’t see - ships disappearing over the horizon not enough for you? Spin but you can’t feel it - ever been in a plane? Doesn’t feel like your doing 400mph does it? Space but you can’t go to it - says who? Flat earthers say you can’t then hold it up as proof that it doesn’t exist, circular logic. Force but you can’t measure it - are you talking about gravity? Weight is a direct result of gravity as is acceleration due towards the earth. None of these arguments holds up against even the most basic of counter arguments. What really irks me though is the flat earth comunity not understanding how things work and then misusing and misrepresenting science to try and explain their cockamamy views. I get through the day just fine using all the technology developed by the same maths and science that prove the earth is a globe. Which technologies did you use today developed by the maths of a flat earth?

I really hope you’re just trolling with this flat earth stuff because it’s a real indictment of the education system if you’re not.

Did you learn the scientific method at school or they just skipped it with you cos you so dumb? as YOU already said, an observation isnt proof of something. Is A=B+C proof for you? and of what?

you retard-maxing again