Zaikaboy's avatar
Zaikaboy 2 months ago
So all this core is bad isn't true then. Either you are twisting your argument because you know knots doesn't have enough clout or you aren't sold on the knots ethos. I will say this a final time, run whatever node you want, I don't care. It is up to you. All I will ask, to everyone, stop behaving like spoilt children. Stop droning on and on, without even accepting you may be wrong. On either side of the fence. Just grow up, its boring

Replies (2)

TheKayman's avatar
TheKayman 2 months ago
I haven’t twisted any argument. I simply responded to your argument that ‘the number of knots nodes is irrelevant because miners will just mine the spam anyway’. It’s actually knots + core prior v30, and the ratio between that sum and core 30 nodes will dictate whether miners can just ‘ignore filters’. It’s important to address this point. An argument I see against knots a lot is that it’s a losing game because miners will just mine spam because they are economically incentivised to. Well if enough nodes filter spam they are not economically incentivised to. The more core 30 nodes the more incentive to mine spam. Core 30 is bad because it facilitates and supports the transfer and relay of arbitrary data anonymously for free anywhere around the globe. That data doesn’t even have to be mined to relayed to the other side of the world. This is an unnecessary attack vector. Granted, the severity of core 30’s impacts is dependent on its adoption.