and what's your point?
The fact that you voiced these concerns, and your concerns didn't stop people (welcome to cryptoanarchy, people can just do things), means that maybe your concerns weren't a showstopper after all
Login to reply
Replies (1)
I apologize, @jb55
I was quite rude here
I've since changed my mind on the topic and agree with you more about on chain zaps. But, regardless of this change of mind, I owe you an apology for my tone
Unlike a lot of other debates (e.g.
BIP-110), this debate has lots of smart people working in good faith and I see lots of people changing their mind. This is bullish for freedom tech, as long as we don't all tear each other apart in the process