Replies (5)

Are you planning anything that will allow for custodial storage of shards? I'm working on (don't read it, it's a mess) and attempting to adapt bifrost to custodial signers with email based recovery for the normies. Unfortunately, it looks like there are too many assumptions baked in about how peers connect to do much more than build directly on top of bifrost. I pinged you yesterday too, but I'm very interested in any input you might have.
We don’t have anything for custodial signers yet but definitely thinking about it in the near future, this seems like a really cool design, though! Yeah, peering is still something that needs to be automated in bifrost otherwise it requires somewhat manual configuration still at this point. I do have a somewhat streamlined and simplified library that wraps bifrost (just a way of encapsulating the basic “igloo“ logic so all the different signers can share the same APIs) maybe this could help some? Going back to read your previous messages now though
Yeah both it and bifrost are still pretty narrow in functionality. We are getting close to doing a more full featured, generic rewrite of the protocol library (in rust btw). Would love to hear what you would like to have in it