I dont mistunderstand anything, your confusion is this notion that btc could potentially succesfully be put off the table/cencored would mean an undermining of the censorship resistance; it doesnt. The btc that gets censored is btc that never resisted; if it did, if it would resist, it would not get censored. Bitcoin does not promis censor-impossibility, if that were true we would not have this discussion in the first place. What is better than 21 million? 20 million is better than 21 million. How would it hurt the value of Bitcoin, if we all effectively hold the dagger when backstabbing the sitting duck btc, doing so because we all realize we are better off for it?