π― True. Labels can still have a role in a Bitcoin powered music economy, the structure just shifts to being artist led in this model. Something weβve been discussing alongside @Aaron of Essex @npub1lwfh...cqve and @Angor.
An artist led model could mean labels would be beholden (so will the artists) to provide a certain level of service to the artist as a collaborative partner, rather than the asset owner like manner in which many behave.
Labels traditionally were helping with artist development, among their other utilities, but this is one of the main things now missing from labels. Artists who understand their worth, leave labels with two choices;
- Develop a random manufactured act (Bad labels donβt want this unless they can trick them.)
- Work with an established act, who could benefit from further development, but on an agreeable basis
Though option one is easy with dangling carrots, the more musicians that turn to NME models, the more fans that use them and budding musicians who are exposed to a different route.
Just like tools, labels are not evil, but the people running them can be.
π«‘
Login to reply
Replies (4)
The idea that the more musicians embrace NME models the more budding artists will see a different path is exactly the kind of shift that makes labels compete on service rather than ownership.
π If you have a moment, our story and campaign details are on my page. Warm regards.
π«‘
i live by this doctrine since 2005, and i facilitate the means for artists to liberate themselves since 2010 via @Basspistol HQ but thanks for preaching to this one here little choir bwoy :ignucius: i guess i need to stop changing pfp and display name to be reckon with haha
Yeah @πππππππππ it was a mental shortcut, I meant the legacy stuff, not some smaller grassroots community projects, let them be: labels, studios, promo, etc. Cool to see you're already familiar with some of the names from 2140 π₯πΆ Solid beats. Enjoy! And may the power of unchained music be with you.