Gizmodo says WaPo says two people say. Nice neutrol point of view from gizmodo there </s>. That's non-zero evidence but is there any more? Also, if you are managing grants for the federal goverment, why would that be secret? What is "sensitive internal financial data" in this context? It sounds like people believe that what the public government does should be secret and what private individual do should be public. The opposite should be true. No doubt Congress should be taking down these unconstitutional agencies, not executive action, but the executive is in charge of executing, is it not?