I don't think this makes sense. Separate clients by themselves cannot offer a compelling alternative. Hiding the protocol from usets is a losing move. If a client tries to compete in the market as if it was a proprietary platform, and if any succeed it will be by capturing and breaking the network.
Login to reply
Replies (3)
Bluesky was compelling enough for a Million Brazilians to sign up.
I wasn't thinking in terms of "hiding" the protocol. More in terms of: "Join Damus/Amethyst, it's a great alternative to twitter that can't get banned because we use the nostr protocol."
Whatever outreach / marketing, i think is more effective it it contains a direct pointer to a client. Because non techies don't want the extra complexity of going
1. nostr
2. *find a client among many
3. register on one of those clients
*there's research that says that to many options lead to indecision.
btw. I think nostr is strong enough in the long run. Things will sort themselves out. We got this @fiatjaf :)
you're retarded