jb55's avatar
jb55 _@jb55.com 7 months ago
so you want a client decoupled from rational, technical debate (which ensures bitcoin continues to function with working incentives). Instead replacing it with ideologically driven hand wavey moral arguments. To each their own! Maybe it’s fine to have a rational client and a more ideological client (knots). If it keeps the meme spamming, tinfoil hat, flat earther bitcoiners away from the github repo then that works for me.

Replies (2)

ESE's avatar
ESE 7 months ago
You do you, we do we. All good, there is enough sats for everybody. image
The point of having a functional alternative increases the quality of the technical debate. You're being intellectually dishonest if you don't think so. Also, if knots ends up having a diverse dev group like core that would be great & I'm sure you'd appreciate that. To your last sentence, this is the childish bullshit I'm talking about.