At this time I feel more comfortable with a fedimint approach to ecash. Its very likely a lack of education on the mechanisms that make it possible.
Im torn because I know this is inevitabke the future of bitcoin but its almost contradictory to the core tenants of bitcoin.
I mean I know it's based on sound money still but cashu mints in my opinion are a little risky, no?
Thanks for this I feel more needs to be written and discussed on the topic!
Login to reply
Replies (1)
All e-cash is risky. Trading gold-backed notes is also riskier than trading gold, but also more convenient. Convenience has value, so riskier monies have a valid use case.
An IoU based upon hard money is obviously better than an IoU based upon softer money. We already have Bitcoin-based IoUs floating around, in the form of paper ETF trades and mining contracts, so bringing that to the masses was just a matter of time.
What I can say, is that having lots of competing mints producing the IoUs is the best option, so long as one doesn't end up with a monopoly. I can also say that trading the IoUs with relay events is gonna add mad uncertainty to an already difficult situation, but people can never get enough convenience AND THE UX, so here we are.