An ISP is protected under common carrier laws. To assume a Bitcoin node is somehow going to get the same treatment is overplaying your hand. Especially when there is currently another version of the software that gives a best effort to avoid spreading it, where as the other implementation invites it in. And the most damaging risk isn’t courts, it’s a reporter with no tools saying “look csam on Bitcoin”. Expending OP_Return makes csam easily visable to anyone with an explorer and not buried in witness gibberish. Being techically sound isn't everything and there is a serious human element missing here. I think the core side is really missing that.
Login to reply
Replies (1)
Better to fight the battle in court than to volunteer infrastructure censorship. You think they’ll stop at OP_RETURN? Talk about overplaying a hand. Careful who you get in bed with.