I am not pro Drivechains but I think this situation is different from 2017 as Drivechain proponents are not proposing a hardfork like bcashers were, BIP300 is a soft-fork, this means indifferent nodes would see the Drivechain chain as valid wouldn't they? You'd have to get people who disagree to actively update via UASF that rejects drive chains and you end up with 2 soft forks fighting each other, where indifferent nodes(not updated) see both chains as valid, therefore they will follow the one with the longest PoW, this means if miners are pro Drivechain they win because the Drivechain chain will have the longest PoW, Correct?