"telling why I don't agree" is a losing stance. So instead of "telling why", here's an invitation to unpack and engage. - An essay about Anarchy as method for knowledge - written on nostr, composed out of atomic units that can be forked and remixed into other collections - highlighted and commented on, which bleeds into any short note feed that supports highlighting, kind 1111 comments Tell me what other system facilitates `ideas` as living systems to this level.
Lucas M's avatar Lucas M
Read this awhile ago. Can confirm. Was a great read🫑. View quoted note β†’
View quoted note →

Replies (2)

Yeah, but you can πŸ˜„ the question now is more about what can you take away from it? We shouldn't have to argue against other's preconceptions as it's a losing game. I like showing. If it resonates, it /really/ resonates. I don't care or have time to convince anyone else any other way 😁🀷
↑