Holy shit. Is this sike saying that we can find the absolute minimum of a non-arbitrary reward function?
Login to reply
Replies (1)
Not quite 😄
I’m not claiming we can magically solve arbitrary global minima problems.
What I am saying is this:
If the semantic substrate is algebraic and deterministic —
you don’t need to “search for a minimum” in a floating loss landscape in the first place.
You traverse a structured state space.
Gradient descent is necessary when:
your representation is continuous
your objective is statistical
your model is approximate
If your state transitions are discrete and algebraically closed, the problem shifts from optimization to traversal and validation.
Different game.
And yeah… I’ve been quietly stewing in this for about two years now.
It’s less “we found the absolute minimum”
and more “why are we even climbing hills for semantics?” 😄