Changing the supply cap is theoretically easier than shutting Bitcoin down, but both involve making thousands of people distributed around the world adopt new rules at the same time which is practically impossible. At least for supply cap it could be agreed to over time whereas a shutdown needs to be coordinated simultaneously.
People outside of Bitcoin don’t understand the power of this decentralisation and how impotent it makes even the most tyrannical government or insidious cantillionaire who are used to brute forcing people to their whims.
Login to reply
Replies (2)
the segwit2x "new york agreement" event proved this.
every major company, almost all the hash rate, got together in a private meeting and agreed to change bitcoin.
they got fucking wrecked.
the most important event in the history of bitcoin.
https://dcgco.medium.com/bitcoin-scaling-agreement-at-consensus-2017-133521fe9a77
Men in smoke filled rooms making decisions for the world is the old way of doing things, a small group thought they could do the same thing on Bitcoin and found out the hard way - You can’t brute force consensus.
The only way to change consensus is coalition building over time, explaining and educating how the changes align to individual incentives.
That’s why the supply cap won’t change - it’s in no-ones interests so no coalition of any substance will be built around it.