Keychat's avatar
Keychat 6 months ago
All five are client-server models. Server authority and user counterparty risk both decrease from left to right.
Keychat's avatar Keychat
If you operate your own Lightning channel, that’s the best case — you can use a fully native Lightning wallet. If not, the five wallets mentioned above, each with their own tradeoffs, can still be used to send and receive Lightning payments by leveraging the service provider’s inbound liquidity. The difference lies in how “bitcoin” is stored under the hood — each takes a different form. When both sender and receiver use the same provider and system, payments are typically settled internally without touching the Lightning Network. But if they’re on different providers, the payment is routed through the Lightning Network. View quoted note →
View quoted note →

Replies (3)

Keychat's avatar
Keychat 6 months ago
Cashu is just one implementation of ecash, and Liquid is just one implementation of a sidechain. For a user of a cashu mint, the counterparty risk lies in the possibility that the single mint operator might run off with the funds. For a user of Liquid, the counterparty risk is that multiple federation members might collude to steal the funds.