Uncertain whether a valid user case, as the late Mr Lennon imagined. Paying for services iโ€™m sure there are payment services for, be it the artist or a worthy cause, but buy sats to donate sounds like a sketchy argument to justify all sorts of deviant and corrupt practices and all money going to them sure sounds like a script trying to lip service a good time for thieving. No cute for intermediates while being the intermediate sounds like a broken nation, broken economy and soon behind bars operatives. Would have been better convincing as a social wallet service for friends, but guessing difficult to do when needing to close those conceptual pitfalls of corruption. image

Replies (1)

So if the social media in question is not the mediating body, how would that make sense, and why would people be donating instead of paying for services and charity? The underlying argument is weak and corrupt when needing to imagine. ๐Ÿ˜‰
โ†‘