Yes, thank you for mentioning this. I have tried Joplin but personally prefer managing information the way LogSeq does it. The main reason I included Joplin in this writeup is actually because they offer a plugin that attempts to bridge Joplin with LogSeq, by way of allowing the user to create "nested lists of nodes." It's a start, but the software is designed away from this concept, so it remains a relic amongst their ecosystem which is rarely used.
However, what you share is relevant- the flexibility of Joplin's third-party ecosystem appears to be their greatest asset.
Login to reply
Replies (2)
he's talking about obsidian. you should reach out to the plugin author.
Ah, yeah, my mistake. In that case Obsidian is a really good starting point.
I have used it in the past, it was the very promising "EverNote Killer," but it never delivered for a certain subset of users. I can use Obsidian for some documents but prefer other editors. What it lacks is what LogSeq provides. There is actually a plugin that tries to provide LogSeq-style structure but the app just isn't designed around this, so it falls flat. I will check out the plugin author though, I appreciate your suggestion!