I thought that was just about foot-gun risk for wallets, nothing to do with the network. Am I wrong?
Login to reply
Replies (4)
Exactly.
nope, besides the risk, it outs all the shady irresponsible dudes going "let it run even if it’s garbage"
Yes, the compromised Core devs banned Core V30 because of the critical bug that deletes wallets and all Bitcoin.
But their reckless change of OP_RETURN from 80 Bytes to 100 000 Bytes does have an effect on the network.
Large OP_RETURN increases the risk of CSAM because it makes easier to add large data / jpegs via the network and not only directly via miners who a liable when they directly add data.

Large OP_RETURN increases the risk of CSAM because it makes easier to add large data / jpegs via the network and not only directly via miners who a liable when they directly add data.

Total size vertical is all zero