You're a simp. I'm not engaging in your gaslighting. Everytime you've pointed the finger here three have been pointing back at you. People can have bad days. That was last night. You doubled down this morning. Showing who you really are. It's sad to see. Enjoy your bed with NVK. I'm out.

The contention is not that his vote would weigh more than others. The issue brought up is that FOSS is a mindset diametrically opposed to copyright. To be on a board promoting and funding FOSS projects has a responsibility to be objective. The conflict of interest involved with making copyright claims on a FOSS project because it seems to "Infringe" on one's own product leads one to think: If one 9th of the board is compromised ethically, I have an 11% chance of my donations being squandered by passing up projects "Too close" to projects NVK might have an interest in. This is not retarded or irrational. I don't care about Opensats myself as I give charity only to people I know personally. This is merely an explanation of where others are coming from.

It's majority voting.

OK. Don't forget a core piece of this whole issue, GitHub. If the code were hosted in a non-centralized, we would all just laugh at NVK and move on. The only reason there's an impact to BTCLOCK is the code repos are gone.