Move the goal post all you want Funding development of Nostr is not the same as funding bitcoin development. You sound retarded by comparing oranges to ostriches. Your Open sats grants to Nostr devs are a grift. You fund developers like Arkinox who deliver projects dead on arrival. The best Nostr projects didn’t receive open sats grants and if they did it was minimal. Relaytools a project that actually delivers was denied a subsequent grant after lots of traction and POW. Why don’t you open source the grant recipients amounts ? Or would the plebs be disgusted? Open sats starting to sound like open ai. Open in name only. The fact that you have a 501C open stats and a venture capitalist company 1031 is a huge conflict of interest. This lets you pick and choose which one goes in the portfolio company and which one receives grants you can also block people from receiving grants because they might compete with one of the portfolio companies. NVK one of your board members on open sats is also funded by 1031 for coin kite. Example- Not too long ago there was some controversy over NVK issuing a cease-and-desist letter to the guy that was trying to do the open source block clock. I doubt open sats or 1031 would fund someone competing with coinkite. That is just 1 example. Primal isn’t hated enough. The primal client stigmatized Nostr giving it a bad rep, now that you are back on X go see what people have to say about it. Lastly you still never addressed Adam “Andy” Back attending Epstein island and taking Epstein’s money. You are throwing shade at Saylor and protecting someone who has ties with Epstein and who is a Core 30 proponent.