I understand how the halving works. I was just saying currently ~19.7 million BTC is still less than 21 million BTC. Bitcoin is still technically inflating until ~2140 Yes, Bitcoin will eventually have less/no inflation to Monero, but Monero's inflation as a % of total supply is always decreasing. Blockchains need to pay miners in some way or it doesn't work . You can pay them with inflation, tx fees, or a mix. Depending on tx fees to secure the chain, along with a fixed blocksize, leads to ridiculously unusable fees when it is even moderately used (see $100+ tx fees earlier this year - will get worse the more it is used). It's a trade-off. >"Monero’s rate of inflation is similar to gold, but that means it is not as good of a store of value as bitcoin. " The same thing that supposedly makes Bitcoin a better store of value arguably makes it a worse money: Gold/Monero tail emission + periodically lost/burned coins = reality: roughly stable supply = asymptotically ideal money Bitcoin fixed supply + periodically lost/burned coins = reality: constantly decreasing supply = incentivized never to use (more analagous to a digital asset) 'Such expectancy creates reluctance for bitcoin investors (hodlers) to spend their bitcoin, since they believe it a sensible probability they’ll be surrendering future growth in doing so.' >"Blockchain transparency is a feature, not a bug. Bitcoin is superior in every way." Depends, superior for what ends? Definitely not superior for privacy, fungibility, and targeted mining censorship. >"How does buying Monero with a debit card offer any more security than transacting on a Bitcoin L2 that mimics Monero?" You don't necessarily need a debit card to get Money. You can work for it, sell goods for it, or buy it with cash. Those transacations have to eventually settle on-chain at some point. A liability for whoever is managing those channels. They can also be force-closed against their will leaking data on chain. It's kind of apples and oranges to compare a blockchain to an L2 anyway since they have different advantages. Would be more analogous to compare an eventual Monero L2 to a Bitcoin L2.

Replies (1)

Are you a Keynesian? A deflationary asset encouraging saving rather than unnecessary spending is a good thing. When it comes to tx fees, you are missing the important fact that energy cost is constantly reducing. Being incentivized to save does not make Bitcoin worse as money. Additionally, L2 solutions can circumvent increasing tx fees. The fact that BTC is a superior store of value compared to Monero and that it can be used in exactly the same ways as Monero means that Monero has no place. There is a reason Monero has not gained widespread adoption. It never will, because it is a shitcoin. Everything Monero can do, Bitcoin can too.