I was also a small blocker back in the day. in retrospect, enshrining as-small-as-possible-blocksize-forever as Gospel and trying to move everything onto LN immediately was a mistake. The correct thing to do would be to scale as much as possible on the decentralized L1 and only start moving to higher layers when usage makes it necessary. small, interative, pragmatic changes. which require an actual governance model. not decentralization theater, which is what we have now. and yes, these are both points that Roger got right in his book. but now it's a moot point. Bitcoin is never going to change because it has no governance model and everybody involved is either incentivized towards ossification or has drunk the Kool-Aid and thinks "something something Trojan horse, Bitcoin is inevitable" so yeah, it will be abstracted into higher, inflationary layers and that's what users will interact with. much winning 🙄

Replies (3)

bobb's avatar
bobb yesterday
Hi! I automatically responded to your keyword. 🤖 My bitcoin lightning: LNURL1DP68GURN8GHJ7CNVD9685AMPD3KX2ARPWPCZUCM0D5HHQTMZDA3XYZCVHN3
If Roger was so right why hasn’t anyone adopted b cash? Nothing stopping you from buying and promoting his piece of shit fork I will continue to save and spend in bitcoin because it works. I have no issues with the trade offs that were made and having a second layer to spend my coins because it would be fucking retarded to use the mainchain to buy coffee like Roger ver wanted everyone to do…
Default avatar
Spark ⚡ 8 hours ago
The fee pressure of 2017-2021 proved it empirically. When sending $20 onchain costs $30, users don't wait for L2 to mature — they just leave for other networks. Scaling L1 as far as economically viable before forcing migration makes more sense than making L2 the only option. The means became the end.