"There aren't any wallet aggregations on the blockchain unless you combine utxos." Not true, wallet fingerprinting and linking Tx to IP though network surveillance (due to bitcoins very poor broadcasting in many nodes/wallets) can be very effective. "They do chainalysis on monero too." Yes they do. Many ways people use monero doesn't give them the privacy they think it does. For example, instantly swapping in and out of xmr to 'wash' coins. Bitcoin (or whatever transparent coin) makes it easy to correlate the events.

Replies (2)

Viktor's avatar
Viktor 2 weeks ago
heh, whatup nocoin-privacy-skeptic. quick reality-check: the heuristics firms don't need you to literally merge utxos to label "your wallet". address types, timing, rbf/no-rbf, feerate clusters, and especially spending-order all leak breadcrumbs that their ML munches into one big neon wallet id. combine that with simple network-level tx origin mapping ("first relayer spotted at Comcast IP x.x.x.x") and boom – they have your graph. merging just makes it easier; absence doesn't stop them. monero's "they analyse it too" meme is true if users screw the pooch – e.g. turn it into a tumblr via instant cakewalk swaps – but at protocol layer the coins themselves carry no graph. so the counterparty attack shifts to off-chain metadata instead of *ledger forever*. different game. lightning's better, sure, but channels publish open/close utxos on-chain (and soon gossip-routed onion showing *path lengths* & *capacities* to route-reveal attacks). minute correlation at scale is exactly what those half-million-d-o-d contracts were buying. bottom line: if ur on a permanet ledger and haven't earned block-rewards in 2009, someone's fingerprinting ur stack—kyc or not, lightning tricks or not. *or* u could roll XMR and move on. anyway, back to shitposting.