Thread

Zero-JS Hypermedia Browser

Relays: 5
Replies: 4
Generated: 05:48:44
Former UK Chancellor George Osborne has just criticised the UK's failure on Bitcoin. And he's absolutely right. In his recent opinion piece in the Financial Times, Osborne reflects on using the UK's first Bitcoin ATM 11 years ago and how Britain let that early lead slip away. The world is moving fast, and the UK is falling further behind. At least someone is paying attention. He names the symptoms we know too well: - Retail investors blocked from spot Bitcoin ETFs - Banks routinely freezing lawful transactions - Startups suffocated by slow, unclear onboarding - Policymakers hiding behind regulators while others build Osborne calls for political courage and clarity. He wrote, "On crypto and stablecoins, as on too many other things, the hard truth is this, we're being completely left behind. It's time to catch up." If we missed the first wave, which was Bitcoin, we are now at risk of missing the second, which is stablecoins. Other countries are advancing rapidly with clear legal frameworks and a drive to innovate. The UK remains stuck. Osborne draws the same line we've been making at Bitcoin Policy UK. Bitcoin is not the same as "crypto." It is foundational monetary infrastructure. Stablecoins are financial plumbing. Both matter, but both require distinct, thoughtful regulation. That clarity is still missing here. His call for a new Big Bang moment and serious reform in the spirit of the 1980s. At Bitcoin Policy UK we've been sounding this alarm in meetings, consultations, articles, and in conversations across government. Osborne's article reinforces exactly what we've been saying. Without urgent change, we risk becoming a cautionary tale. The UK doesn't lack talent and opportunity. It lacks leadership. Osbourne gets it. The question is... will anyone in Westminster catch up? Read the full article here: https://www.ft.com/content/2b554e86-a4a6-4361-8db6-04876528b02b image
2025-08-04 09:10:58 from 1 relay(s) 4 replies ↓
Login to reply

Replies (4)

Papers written by nostr:nprofile1qqs80cjjxm2psuux933tsd0w5ljjtf49j9rxnxmyajweh3cgg5ca76gpzpmhxue69uhkummnw3ezumt0d5hszxthwden5te0wfjkccte9eekummjwsh8xmmrd9skctcvlcc3m, Chief Policy Officer at nostr:nprofile1qqsp02kerjznyqgla3gujxw33dhr80lm7pvhp9vn8p2f2095afggdcgpp4mhxue69uhkummn9ekx7mqpz4mhxue69uhk2er9dchxummnw3ezumrpdejqp30luf. 1. Response to FCA Discussion Paper DP25/1 – Regulating Cryptoasset Activities Published 21 June 2025. This paper covers issues such as trading platforms, DeFi activity, onboarding hurdles, and authorisation. It highlights the regulatory obstacles that limit Bitcoin access in the UK and push innovation offshore. https://img1.wsimg.com/blobby/go/aea8e937-fd18-400f-afd9-c3513112c757/downloads/5aef4f9d-f986-43c4-bccf-39f347066c3e/DP25_1%20-%20BPUK%20Response.pdf 2. Response to FCA Discussion Paper DP24/4 – Admissions, Disclosures and Market Abuse Regime for Cryptoassets Published 7 March 2025. This paper addresses how cryptoasset services should be treated under UK financial promotions, disclosure rules and governance frameworks. It reinforces the need to distinguish Bitcoin as monetary infrastructure. https://img1.wsimg.com/blobby/go/aea8e937-fd18-400f-afd9-c3513112c757/downloads/7e694ea8-12b4-4780-8fba-384232fe1ca1/Briefing%20Discussion%20Paper%20FCA%20DP24_4%20Regulatin.pdf 3. Guidance on the Cryptoasset Reporting Framework (CARF) Published 16 January 2025. This technical paper offers analysis and policy recommendations regarding HMRC’s crypto tax reporting regime (CARF) including transparency obligations on cryptoasset transactions. It clarifies how Bitcoin differs from tokenised assets in compliance expectations. https://img1.wsimg.com/blobby/go/aea8e937-fd18-400f-afd9-c3513112c757/downloads/014a4f70-7568-4b00-9038-8722b548df0a/Commentary%20on%20CARF%20reporting%20framework%2016Jan25.pdf 4. Open Letter Response to the City Minister on Bitcoin Strategic Reserve for the UK Published 13 March 2025. This response proposes how a UK based Bitcoin strategic reserve could function in alignment with national financial infrastructure strategy. https://img1.wsimg.com/blobby/go/aea8e937-fd18-400f-afd9-c3513112c757/downloads/e008429a-2617-4b8c-b1d8-93d2a95b564a/Letter%20Response%20to%20City%20Minister%20Emma%20Reynolds.pdf
2025-08-04 09:15:02 from 1 relay(s) ↑ Parent Reply
3 harmful ways Britain is a Bitcoin blocker: - banks blocking/ restricting access to exchanges - silly, irrelevant regulatory questionnaires - no access to Bitcoin ETFs Pointed out by a former UK Chancellor today and by nostr:nprofile1qqsp02kerjznyqgla3gujxw33dhr80lm7pvhp9vn8p2f2095afggdcgpzpmhxue69uhkummnw3ezuamfdejszrthwden5te0dehhxtnvdakqz2r55r for ages. https://bitcoinpolicyuk.substack.com/p/anti-bitcoin-britain nostr:nevent1qqs8t6epak6lttmf0d70ryqyulnmue9n25jecej35p4gvl3epzj60tcp9dmhxue69uhhyetvv9ujuumwdae8gtnnda3kjctv9aex2mrp0yh8xmn0wf6zuum0vd5kzmqmm7l8p
2025-08-04 10:03:09 from 1 relay(s) ↑ Parent Reply
'....both require distinct, thoughtful regulation.' What kind of regulation does Bitcoin need? I think it regulates itself, and I'd argue this is a strength. It does not need, and has never needed, the government. Do WE need the government? More and more, I think the government is not only unnecessary but also detrimental to us all.
2025-08-04 10:14:13 from 1 relay(s) ↑ Parent Reply