Thread

Zero-JS Hypermedia Browser

Relays: 5
Replies: 3
Generated: 11:41:33
Login to reply

Replies (3)

This is the correct answer. It is also typically cheaper to pay the APR than it is to pay cap gains. 13% APR on 100k loan @ 50% LTV means put down 1.818 BTC for the 100k disbursement. Total interest on the 1 year loan is $7,180.73. Loan interest payments are also tax deductible. If you sold .91 BTC to get the 100k cash then you would owe 15% of your gain. So if your cost basis was less than $52,000 you would pay more in cap gains than interest. If you took a loan against your sats one year ago exactly you would be up 75%, and that’s the real reason why people borrow against their stack vs selling.
2025-08-26 15:47:31 from 1 relay(s) ↑ Parent 2 replies ↓ Reply
Sure. Its subjecting 1.818 BTC to custodian risk to save a small difference between APR and cap gains. I guess my point is thats alot of risk for a very small reward. The appeal is to possibly capture the 26%+ CAGR of the collateral, assuming the custodian risk doesn't harm anything. Idt most Celsius users expected Celsius to freeze withdrawals when it did.
2025-08-26 17:34:11 from 1 relay(s) ↑ Parent 1 replies ↓ Reply