Thanks for replying. But there is a monetary transaction attached to the jpegs. Well, since Calle built in the filers for the cashu mints, we know for sure that filters work. 😂 And I am not debating that at all. I just see, that the network of nodes prepared for 4 MB blocks. And since the limit is not breached, everything works as intended. At the same time of course I don’t like the super retarded ‘art collections’ of dickbutts on chain. But I think the usecase of leaving some personal data on chain (something like ‘XYX was here building on bitcoin in 2025’ and my for my future grandchildren will look it up is pretty cool. Immutable, forever. I just like it (but didn’t do it yet).

Replies (1)

This comment will be most likely ignored (as I’ve noticed non-technical comments get little consideration). IMO this whole story raises much worry because it has revealed that core: 1) has very little consideration for non-economic node runners 2) their reaction was authoritarian, incredibly arrogant and immature 3) the reasons provided were not sufficiently strong and had way too many assumptions (pretty clear it was done for gains) 4) suddenly bitcoin is not a database for money but rather a database for whatever 5) increasing the limit by 1000% instead of in smaller incremental steps is not a cautious way to proceed (what happened to move slowly and not brake things?) The change itself could be ok, but it’s the whole other aspects cited above that are worry af. This could be the first of many worse steps, gotta keep the vigilant paranoia up man