Thread

Zero-JS Hypermedia Browser

Relays: 5
Replies: 2
Generated: 02:48:38
🎾 The 54% Rule Roger Federer won nearly 80% of his 1,526 career singles matches. But when you break it down point by point, he only won 54% of the points he played. One of the greatest athletes in history, with eight Wimbledon titles and 20 Grand Slams, was losing almost every other point. And yet, over the long run, that tiny 4% edge above 50/50 compounded into total dominance. The maths is brutal and beautiful. In tennis, small advantages cascade through games, sets, and matches. A 54% point win rate doesn’t feel like much in the moment. But stretched across thousands of points, it becomes an 80% match win rate. The lesson extends far beyond tennis. You don’t need to be right all the time. You don’t need to win every exchange, every deal, every argument. You just need to be slightly better than average, consistently, over a long enough time horizon. As Federer put it in his Dartmouth commencement speech: “The best in the world are not the best because they win every point. It’s because they know they’ll lose again and again, and have learned how to deal with it.” Stop chasing perfection. Chase the edge. Then let compounding do the rest. image
2025-12-02 10:04:18 from 1 relay(s) 1 replies ↓
Login to reply

Replies (2)

Position sizing is everything in order to extract your edge. Not chasing the news not following the credentialized just position sizing. If you have an edge this is how you find it. Then you can go down the position sizing rabbit holes like kelly criterium if you have the stomach for it.
2025-12-02 12:26:24 from 1 relay(s) ↑ Parent 1 replies ↓ Reply
People attack trading but everything is a trade so this applies to everything in life. Funny thought, using modified kelly for time management.
2025-12-02 12:35:27 from 1 relay(s) ↑ Parent Reply