Rabble was unable to censor as he desired, but he was "Community Noting" as a fallback. He was also using a centralised opaque regime-linked service to do it, and you're not. But the concept is the same - a (more or less) centralised "source of truth" gets to visibly assert authority over other people's speech.

Replies (2)

So, rating our follows for trustworthiness? That's okay then. I don't mind, but I also don't see the need. My follows call out BS all the time.