I mean Saylor straight up says in the interview that there's no way adoption will happen if Bitcoin pursues strong privacy. You think power structures will allow it to happen AFTER they are heavily invested? We could hardly get Segwit. You think you're going to get Blackrock consensus on a hard fork to allow full chain membership proofs?

Replies (1)

if the price is just >0, how are miners incentivized to secure the network? also re mining it seems inadvisable to continue to do sha256 since hash is likely to be negligable, the network would be trivial to attack and with no confidence nobody would use the network and since nobody is using the network it isnt private maybe its a question of details wherea would be price end up? exactly what privacy preserving techniques? etc but basically id say a private version of btc does not make *good enough* tradeoffs to disrupt xmr and zec