I don't have an antipathy to the _state_ — as a word or concept— so I can just call a state a state, without suffering cognitive dissonance and feeling the urge to rename it. We can discuss whether larger or smaller states are better, but a state consisting of a cow village on a hill is still a state.

Replies (1)

My point is that humans don't NEED a state and the coercion that goes along with it, ESPECIALLY in the context of the fact that we have a model of how to do so in the history of The Church. I am not OK with any coercion. That is not Christ-like.