I doubt that it must lead to a poor investment. I would obviously consent to the speech.
Login to reply
Replies (2)
Something better than nip05 is needed to prove authenticity. Maybe it's web of trust. But point is if you pay to fake a user, and then you get muted, all you achieved was to provide some free promotion for the real user.
Want to do an experiment? Say I want you to make a post that defames Ross Albricht. It is a logically sound argument, but you normally wouldn't say such a thing yourself due to whatever bias you have.
To fill the gap of the bias, a negotiation or offer is made to 'get the word out'. Well, now I am incentives to accept the offer. It sounds rational on its face, and I could use the money.