Yes, I suppose the 'realist' theory I'm going by predicts what the US will seek to do (get control of smaller nations and attack larger enemies with them), but not whether it will succeed with that strategy. Did it succeed with Ukraine +sactions? Probably not. Russia retooled and is perhaps even stronger now, making ammunition far faster, shifted its trade to more reliable partners, etc. This idea of using Iran to attack China is kind-of a wild thought I never had until this moment. I've never heard anybody suggest it. I'm just drawing from theory and speculating, maybe a bit wildly.

Replies (1)

Indeed, Syria has been able to change its regime, and Iran is clearly unbalanced in power, so if the US joins in, it will be possible to make it pro-American "again". However, I was really surprised that the "two weeks" was a trick. It seems that, in his mind, the latest attack was also part of the negotiation process with no declaration of war and it's still ongoing, but how far will such an attitude work in the world?