Fuck Jews Joe's avatar
Fuck Jews Joe 6 months ago
I'm not saying tyranny won't always emerge I'm saying that a tyrant isn't omnipresent and is always inefficient no matter how much surveillance tech, A.I. processors or manpower you throw at him Let me present you my POV the effect of disclosed transactions in capitalistic ecosystem goes both ways: 1- it makes it easier for bad actors such as state to collect taxes. 2- it lays the ground for well informed participants. And I am fully convinced that the goods of the second outweighs the bads of the first so much that its unmeasurable just imagine if post ww-i gold restrictions were transparent, the whole state of affairs would have changed, people would've acted accordingly from the start or maybe a populist pushback might arised, idk Not a single state has a problem with private deals as long as it's recorded on a balance sheet What the autsrian economic sphere failed to articulate about capitalism are two important rules: 1- you can't sell what you don't own 2- deals must be disclosed If the first is kept the latter is already harder to do Nobody is obligated to bookkeep deals records but it must be disclosed for the market to function, (the nation isn't a market) Capitalism isn't a natural phenomenon It has order Capitalism doesn't push for middle-men hiding under "private deals" rather it obsolete them Take this example: A trading platform that sells stocks in gold never ever runs out of gold!!, how is that even possible? I call these Jewish Markets it's literally the mainstream everywhere nowadays, they don't follow the 2 rules mentioned above, they prefer to keep their "PRIVACY" in their deals No one benefits from such practices except zogs
↑ Parent

Replies (1)

ProfAnarch's avatar
ProfAnarch ProfAnarch@mostr.pub 6 months ago
In my opinion, you're struggling with the most serious form of "category error." You're confusing the economic outcome of a trade (the price signal) with the personal data of the participants (metadata). You also fail to distinguish clearly between signal and noise, and you fall into the "Informed Participant" fallacy. You claim that "disclosed transactions/deals" create well-informed participants. This is an epistemological disaster. I'm repeating myself too damn much but, for a market to function, participants need to know the "price" -the ratio at which A was exchanged for B. They do "not" need to know the identity of the buyers, their total net worth, or their previous spending habits. By demanding "full disclosure", you are not calling for a "well-informed market"; you are calling for a financial panopticon; in this context you need to look for the concept of "unintended consequences". In a truly capitalist order, the "signal" is the price at which a voluntary exchange occurs. Anything beyond that -the "who," the "how much is left," and the "where did it come from"- is private property, and IS PRIVATE. To demand access to that metadata is a socialist (jewish/zionist) encroachment practice on the digital boundaries of the individual. You complain about "trading platforms that never run out of gold" and "selling what they don't own." You're goddamn right to hate these fraudulent practices (even I'm calling them "Neo-Sadducees"), but you are dead wrong about the solution. You think "forced public disclosure" is the answer. History proves that public ledgers and state-regulated/oversighted balance sheets are the primary tools used by the very "cartels" (especially Jewish Finance Monopolies) you mention to hide their tracks behind layers of complexity and legal jargon. Monero's privacy solves this through cryptography, not bureaucracy or obscuration. Through "View Keys", Monero allows for "Voluntary, Granular Disclosure". A custodial exchange can prove its reserves to its users without exposing those users to the state or the public. Monero ensures that "you can't sell what you don't own" via mathematical consensus (preventing double-spending and inflation) while ensuring that the ZOGs or the States cannot weaponize your transaction history against you. I'd also like to point out that Monero is the only "Hard Money" that is technically impossible to "rehypothecate" (create paper versions of) because every unit is verified by the protocol, not by a crooked auditor's "disclosed balance sheet." Your reliance on the "inefficiency" and the "lack of omnipresence" of the state is a loser's strategy, sorry. In the age of AI-driven chain analysis and 24/7 blockchain heuristics, the cost of surveillance is approaching zero. To say "the tyrant is inefficient" while handing him a transparent ledger (Bitcoin) is like saying "the assassin is a bad shot" while standing in an open field under a spotlight. A cypherpunk or a Monero proponent never relies on the incompetence of the enemy; he relies on the impossibility of the task. Monero makes the state's surveillance task mathematically impossible. Your claim that "Capitalism isn't a natural phenomenon" (WTF!) reveals your underlying collectivism. Capitalism is simply the result of Natural Law: the inalienable right to self-ownership and the right to homestead and exchange property. When you say "Deals must be disclosed," you are inventing a "social duty" that does not exist in property ethics. If I swap my silver for a neighbor's cow, and we both agree to keep it private, any "third party" who demands to see that record is an aggressor. Privacy is the wall around property. If you tear down the wall in the name of "market transparency," you have already destroyed the property itself. You claim to hate Jewish Markets and Zionist Finance Cartels for their secrecy, yet you fail to see that their power comes from "controlled transparency" -where they see everything you do, but you see nothing they do. Monero flips the tables (pun intended with its whip). It gives the individual absolute, mathematical privacy, while forcing any entity claiming to hold "reserves" to prove them through "View Keys" if they want the market's trust. Monero is the ultimate tool for the de-cartelization of the world. It is the only system where the rules are enforced by math, not by the "disclosed" lies of a balance sheet. Privacy isn't for the ZOGs, Cartels and Jewish Monopolies; it's for their victims. Transparency isn't for the people; it's for the institutions. You have them backwards. A market without privacy is just a database for the tax collector. Real capitalism happens in the shadows of the state, protected by the light of cryptography.
↑