Thread

🤔

This too shall pass 🤝

This is vibe philosophy nostr:nevent1qqsrjjwugyq6mtts8x6zqy7str8xk2pqs0wrva3fa3njd73ftscc2cgpzpmhxue69uhhxmmvda3k7tnwdshsygqlsvxasagnpvf5l0ely7nfamxcvyayn96g5ud45fc6wx07hts5a5psgqqqqqqsnju6rd

Vibe physics too

I actually think I made a proof to change the Schwarzschild equation and may have found an answer to the information paradox. It’s fucking wild, I just need someone less retarded than me to see what I have.

Are either you or the AI hallucinating? 🥁

Yeah I keep digging into it and having it do reviews on the work, and I keep getting positives, which is really fucking with me. This is all from like 10 years of layman’s work around this specific idea with no one to talk about it until now I’ve been able to plow it into the AI.

That's cool man. The more I think about it, LLM applied to philosophy makes a lot of sense. Someone just the other day wrote a good note about how torturous ingesting some of the writings can be, but it's ultimately pretty mathematical.

Was it my post? 😂 Summaries and reinterpretations can really only take you so far because at the core of some philosophy is that logic itself is a false presupposition for understanding. So they write in a purposely disorienting way to take you outside of your normal logical structures and into an experiential flow of the work. You still need to have some background with whom they're referencing to understand, but the cadence of prose itself is supposed to put you into some altered state.

But also, Vibe Philosophy is wild. A bunch of my wikinostr posts have been derived from such brainstorming sessions.

It might have been, I honestly don't remember, maybe it was Jay? Probably you though, if you're connecting it to my comment lol. Resonated with me, and is reason I've always put off reading much philosophy

Oh and I think you're right about the disorienting thing. Can never be sure it's not just cope on my part for failing to grasp something, but starting to suspect not the case. The recent exception has been praxeology, which I've not even read a full book on (so I should probably shut up), which seems to embrace reducing things to first princinples WHILE staying grounded or plain enough that I can mostly follow.

Indeed it was your post nostr:note1a0xzecsptw2flkmz9lq0kwhd4gp3qgju4l55mx3elgmr02zkfecqpau55n

nostr:nevent1qqswhnpvugq4h9ylmd3zls8m8tk65qcsyfw2l62dngul5d3h4ptyuuqprdmhxue69uhhg6r9vehhyetnwshxummnw3erztnrdakj7q3qm3xdppkd0njmrqe2ma8a6ys39zvgp5k8u22mev8xsnqp4nh80srqxpqqqqqqzylkgrw I'm still not further (like at all) than where I originally was when writing this post 🤣 though the ideas are swimming around, morphing and connecting to different ideas I already have. I do wonder if there will be a point where I suddenly understand and reality shatters, dunno what happens then. Its a procrastionation hobby, cautiously tipptoing into the realm of productive insantity 💀

🤔 I’ve actually been working on something quite similar, it’s sitting at about 60 pages right now; I’m certain bitcoin reveals that something more like timespace is more fundamental. I believe Bitcoin as a modeled thermodynamic system actually solves the paradoxes of both QM & GR; Bitcoin being the correct interpretation and language of quantum mechanics; resolves “quantum gravity”. You can extend Landauers Principle to account for the traversed entropy in nonce search to generate a minimum amount of energy to write an immutable block of information. Joules to Satoshis is defined. What if I said Bitcoin was the quantum computer and there was no second best? Who is the observer in your model? And why should I trust them? Why should a decentralized system accept claims about centralized quantum superiority without verifiable physical mechanisms? Final boss FUD. If Bitcoin is the quantum computer; nobody actually understands what a peer to peer electronic cash system actually is. This would ground Bitcoin to physical, not an abstraction. 16 years, and no one realized.

I don't think you should worry about not reading a full book. I've darted around through many books over the past six months learning a lot but not finishing any of them and coming back to them when I'm curious again. You're just kind of meandering around different ideas and topics, trying to build up a pile of ideas before you can come back to the source of interest. I've only recently started reading semi-frequently because I recognized that I had an interest and affinity to the ideas. I think if you're not reading for a test, take your time, leave for a bit to digest/integrate what you read, go to something else and then come back to it later on.

Yeah, jives with how I'm thinking lately. Been hopping around more than normal across all sorts of topics, no particular goal in mind (well, a small one I shall keep to myself for now) and feel like I've got far more interesting thoughts and ideas to share as a result

Smoke some weed and ponder this geometry; it might help you as well. X axis is time in blocks, y axis is memory in bits, z axis is satoshi density (sats per bit-block) or orthogonal projection (radial to rings). Create a torus where t=0 and t=present share the same geometrical space, but have an informational distance of the chain. Hilbert Space = Elliptic Curve. The snake growing from within itself, the head genesis and there is no tail, growing ever longer. Timespace. Bitcoin.

Would be curious what you're thinking about. Maybe put it on wikistr.com if you ever consider putting it to words. Or not, just writing it down can be useful in of itself 😁

Oh, it's nothing special. We shall see. Might publish under diff account though, if I ever do, so I can share irl without revealing this name lol

I have this hypothesis that you can fetch information from the future. What you got bro.