Calling #Bitcoin “non-fungible” is only valid within KYC-regulated rails. In non-KYC P2P trade, the assumption collapses. The irony is that those fretting most about taint are the same ones preaching non-KYC purity.
Login to reply
Replies (2)
Could you elaborate on the idea, please?
Concerns over Bitcoin’s “taint” or fungibility issues stem mainly from KYC-regulated environments, where coins are tracked and differentiated by origin. In contrast, in non-KYC peer-to-peer exchanges, all sats are treated equally, exposing the contradiction of those who condemn address surveillance yet still internalize its logic.