I understand what you are saying directionally, but there are a few breaks in logic here:
Filters do work, or else people wouldn't be so upset that some people use them.
Using a filter is a market action, all human action is.
I would submit that it is about OP_RETURN because it was the first placation to spam and arbitrary data that caused this escalation.
Prior to making op return a standard transaction within certain byte parameters, it simply was not propagated to other nodes when an op return transaction was found.
OP_RETURN was given to spammers as the less bad option, but I completely disagree. Eventually, the UTXO set will be "bloated" anyway, from use and the increased value of Bitcoin as money. Let spammers use fake keys to compete with monetary transactions. I see that as perfectly fine.
Login to reply
Replies (1)
Appreciate the depth here. I want to avoid going in circles… and at this point don’t have anything productive to say back besides that I am personally not upset by people choosing their node implementation. In fact that’s a good thing IMO.
My reaction to the current discourse is against the fear mongering and “othering”. It’s not a good look for what I otherwise hope are intelligent people. We may disagree but you seem to have valid reasons to dislike the Core approach at this junction outside of any tribalism.