Not really what I'd call it, if it's been blocking/shadowbanning non-spam genuine users tbh. I'd be glad to to see a better implementation tho. Although I suspect from your answer you don't really see it as a problem maybe? Hope I'm wrong tho:)
Login to reply
Replies (2)
I keep track of how well the filter does. Right now, it's correctly removing 99.6% of incoming spam.
A new implementation has to do better than that.
I suspect from what you've previously mentioned in the past we have differing opinions of 'spam' so I'm not sure about the usefulness of your 'kills 99.9% of germs' answer lol ;)