I agree that this statement is extreme, but a more practical position can be carefully and rationally built starting from this baseline of complete rejection of past abuses.
Login to reply
Replies (1)
This is true. I only argue, that there are goods and services, which have systemic importance.
And I do not beleave, that competition is always a good answer. Sometimes colaboration is far more effective. In my eyes securing the humanitarian laws in a country benefits everyone. And to acchieve them I see a benefit if some goods are shared instead of privatized.
I think the dificult part is setting up a shared government. To not only have an elected ruler, but that decisions are directly made through grassroots-democratic. Not delegated.