I probably don't understand half of it. My takes anyway:
1. @npub1az9x...m8y8 makes cool stuff.
2 that someone makes a FOSS version of their products can be considered as a compliment
3. He has the right to not be happy with that
4. It isn't a cool move to use 'legal means' first, but he is still just using his rights of: everyone can do the fuck what they want, just as it's everyone 's right to think this is not a nice move π , everyone would act very different if it would be a real ripoff competitor, but it ain't
5. It is everyone 's right as well to call it a shit move, but calling for boycott is just as shitty π€·π»
6. Not selling their products is cutting your business, not theirs, but I understand the question, you want to offer the service to please your customers, but they also can just choose for themselves π€·π». Might be lower demand so keep lower stock. Again your choice
7. It is a gimmick for which I wouldn't loose my Seats,.but now I want to buy whatever @Djuri has to call it π€
...
8. It is retarded to write posts with numbered lists so you know what I am π
Login to reply
Replies (1)
Love the last take βΎοΈ on its side, weβre all retards in the grand scheme of things