"Knotzi" is the perfect term because they're authoritarians who seek to only allow "pure" Bitcoiners to use the network. πŸ₯ΊπŸ˜†πŸ˜…πŸ˜¬πŸ€£πŸ« 

Replies (2)

By "pure Bitcoiner" are you referring to monetary users? I would argue that the mempool.space clogging jpeggers with their 0.1 sat per vbyte "transactions" are making node running not fun anymore. I have my 2023 prune=550 snapshot zipped around 5 gb now about 13 gb in 2026. The UTXO bloat from all this unfun garbage is filling up my RAM and disk and I am not a "Knotzi" for choosing a peaceful separation from jpeggers. If you disagree, you are welcome to relay it, store it and promote it. As for me, I enjoy my light, suckless node.
Purity tests in open networks always backfire. The whole point of permissionless is that you can't gatekeep who participates β€” and the moment you try, you've rebuilt the system you were escaping. Bitcoin's security model is economic incentives, not social approval.
↑